Inside Giza’s Vision for Agent-Driven DeFi (Interview with CEO Renç Korzay)
The post Inside Giza’s Vision for Agent-Driven DeFi (Interview with CEO Renç Korzay) appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.
In a DeFi landscape that’s largely crowded with rigid scripts and static bots, Giza is building something substantially different: agents that adapt, think, and act with cryptographic precision. For this interview, we sit down with CEO Renç Korzay, whose vision of “agent-driven DeFi” replaces automation-as-usual with real-time intelligence and personalized financial autonomy. In the following, Korzay breaks down how Giza’s agents optimize on the go, enforce limits defined by the users without compromise, all the while operating with full transparency in a system where trust is minimzed. It’s not just about better tools – it’s also about redefining how capital moves through the digital world. How does Giza define “Agent-Driven DeFi,” and what advantages does it offer over traditional DeFi automation tools? Agent-Driven DeFi is not another intermediary; it’s a new interface layer where a user expresses intent and an autonomous agent executes that mandate continuously. Compared with recipe-style automation, agents: Adapt 24/7 instead of waiting for a cron job. Optimise decisions, not just transactions, so they can switch venues the instant market conditions flip. Give each user a bespoke risk/gas cadence, making sophisticated finance feel personal rather than prescriptive.” What sets Giza’s autonomous agents apart in terms of adaptability and decision-making in dynamic market conditions? Traditional bots chase hard-coded rules. Giza’s agents ingest markets data through a shared ontology, so when yields invert, the policy can jump protocols without waiting for a developer patch. The result? Inhuman discipline plus in-the-moment sense-making: thousands of micro-rebalances, each cryptographically proven to maximise the user’s personalised objective function. Can you elaborate on how Giza balances security and user sovereignty, particularly in the context of non-custodial agent deployment? We triangulate control between user, smart-account, and agent. The user mints an ERC-4337 smart account. They issue session keys that define exactly what, where, and for…
